- Customer booked a car with the manufacturer
- Customer was asked to complete the modalities for delivery of the car
- Indication in the proforma invoice that the price prevailing at the time of billing would be applicable
- Billing of the car done a year later
- Meanwhile, increase in excise duty resulting in price hike
- Deposit of the excess amount by customer under protest
- Plea of the customer that since he was not responsible for the delay in the delivery of the vehicle, he was not liable to bear the increase the price
- Held: In terms of s. 64-A (1)(a), it is the liability of the customer to pay the extra price when the excise duty had been enhanced prior to the delivery of the vehicle
- On facts, no evidence to show that there was any deliberate intention on the part of the manufacturer and the dealer to delay the delivery of the vehicle
- Thus, the order passed by the National Commission that the increase in price by way of additional taxes is to be borne by the customer and not by the manufacturer, upheld by Supreme Court.
Case Name:- RAVINDER
RAJ v. M/S. COMPETENT MOTORS CO. PVT. LTD. & ANR.
If you want to read the
judgment please send us the request at legalbuddy@gmail.com
Regards
Team
Legal Point Foundation
For
any Legal query :
legalbuddy@gmail.com
Legal
Point Foundation
Deepak
Miglani (President), Dinesh (Treasurer)
8059670005,9958086337,9215514435
Our main aim is to remove legal ignorance from our
country because legal ignorance is one of the main hurdle in the path of our
development. The Legal Tip/Legal News/Legal Alert are tools to spread legal
awareness among literates. Approximately 50,000 peoples are receiving this
message. Please forward this message to your friends as a contribution to this
holy cause.
No comments:
Post a Comment