IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT &
SESSION JUDGE, DELHI
A
S/o…Sh……R/o…Delhi .....Petitioner/Accused
Versus
State ...… Respondent
FIR No.: 71/91
U/s:………………N.D.P.S. Act
Police Station: Connaught Place
Application
under Section 437, Criminal Procedure Code 1973 for Bail
The
Accused above-named most respectfully SHOWETH:-
1. That
the Accused was arrested by the police on 1st January 1991 and is in
judicial custody since then. It is alleged that on 1st January 1991,
the Accused was suspiciously moving on Baba Kharakh Singh Marg, New Delhi when
the police apprehended him, conducted the search and recovered 3 gms of smack
from his pocket.
2. That
the Accused has been falsely implicated in the instant case and he has nothing
to do with the alleged offence.
3. That
nothing was recovered from the possession of the Accused or at his instance the
so-called case property had been planted upon the accused.
4. That
the Accused is a law-abiding citizen and belongs to a very respectable family
and has never indulged in any illegal activities and commands respect and
admiration in his locality.
5. That
in November, 1990, the Accused found some persons selling smack near Hanuman
Mandir, Connaught Place, New Delhi. The Accused immediately reported it to
police, as a result of which police also arrested some of the persons. Since
then those persons, who were arrested at the instance of the Accused, were
threatening accused to falsely implicate him in a criminal case in collusion
with police. The Accused made a complaint in this regard to the Dy.
Commissioner of Police, true copy of which is annexed hereto as Annexure ‘A’.
6. That
after the said complaint, the Accused was called by Vigilance Department Police
who enquired into his complaint. True copy of the said notice issued by the
Vigilance Cell is enclosed herein as Annexure ‘B’.
7. That
it is unimaginable that the Accused who made a complaint against the selling of
smack, would himself indulge in such activities.
8. That
the Accused is a permanent resident of Delhi and there is no chance of
absconding in case if he is released on bail.
9. That
there is no chance of the Accused tampering with the prosecution evidence in
the event of release on bail.
10. That the Accused is prepared to join the
investigation as and when directed to do so.
11. That the Accused is not a previous
convict and has not been involved in any crime of this nature
except the present case.
12. That the present case is a result of
clear manipulation by the police.
13. That the Accused from all account is an
innocent person.
Prayer
It
is therefore respectfully prayed that the Accused may kindly be released on
bail during the pendency of this case.
Accused
Through
Sd/-
(Advocate)
Place:
Date:
No comments:
Post a Comment